“EL PIQUETERO” Nº 4 - MAIN ARTICLE
Boudou [TN: Argentinian
vice-president] for 2015: The ‘kirchnerist decade’ ends in Ciccone [TN: financial
and corruption scandal in Argentina related with Boudou] and UCEDÉ [TN: right
wing party, former supporter of 76-83 dictatorship, Boudou’s original party]
TO MILITATE THE ELECTORAL CAMPAIGN IS TO STRUGGLE FOR POWER
The challenge of the Coordinating
Committee in defense of the Left Front: we have until June 12th to
call for a FIT’s [TN: “Frente de Izquierda y de los Trabajadores” – Left and
Workers’ Front] Open Congress
@JuanMarinoTPR
Parliamentary
elections in 2013 will take place after Cristina Kirchner gave up the attempt
to reform the constitution and run for a third period, as she has publicly
announced. Immediately, a discussion was opened within kirchnerism about who
will replace Cristina in 2015. Both Diana Conti [fiercely supporter of
Cristina] and Depetri [pique-trucho, “false-piquetero”]
stated that Boudou could be a good replacement.
Nothing could show better the nature of kirchnerism: the 'winning decade' might
conclude in Ciccone and pro-dictatorship UCeDé as the official candidates for presidency
- and even more as part of a 'left wing' that has nothing better to offer [both
Conti and Depetri were considered 'left' elements within kirchnerism against
the Scioli's 'right'].
This
preference of a sector inside kirchnerism towards Boudou is part of a general
orientation of the national government that paves the way to the government for
the right in 2015. As all the media pictures, Cristina wants to maintain both
Scioli and Massa inside the kirchnerist lists, trying to avoid a big electoral
fiasco in the 2013 elections. The formula Scioli-Massa, boosted by some
pro-imperialist and right-wing actors, could even find its way through kirchnerism
instead of Boudou. Kirchnerism proposes us to choose between bane and gallows.
On the other side, what can cloud the future of Scioli-Massa is the thought
that if they participate in the Frente para la Victoria’s [Cristina Kirchner's
party] electoral lists, themselves can be drew by the bad electoral results of Cristina.
What matters, however, is that all the alternatives to kirchnerist exhaustion
imply a pro-imperialist way out of the political situation.
Behind
the so called "model deepening" and "let's go for
everything" [slogans of kirchnerism] there is not a radicalization of
kirchnerism but the preparation for a return to the 90's. Conservative restoration
is born within decomposed kirchnerism itself. The failure of the nationalist attempt
poses the "nac & pop" [nationalist and popular] reconversion
behind the supporters of dictatorship and menemism [right wing peronist Argentinean
president between 1989 and 1999].
A DECADE OF SOYA, DEVALUATION AND LABOR
OUTSOURCING
Cristina
Kirchner's government arrives to parliamentary elections showing the real
nature of the "kirchnerist decade". Behind the "kirchnerist
epic", its real agenda arises, which pictures it as a decadent capitalist force.
The
“money laundering” [blanqueo de capitales] is about the creation of three new
financial products: the CEDIN (real estate and building) and BAADE (petrol and
public opera) which, under the name of "Argentinian Saving Bond for the Economic
Development" will be available in the bond market but will also have a
dollar version that could be bought in the derivative market in pesos
[Argentinian currency]. Its goal is to develop a "two sides" exchange
market (hidden devaluation), and so it's a big step towards the devaluation of
the official exchange rate.
The
refund of the wheat export taxes is also a great concession to the agrarian
capital that developed the capitalist lock-out in 2008 and now is claiming for
devaluation. It is about a 15% hidden devaluation of the rate known as
"wheat dollar". So evident is the operation that the president of the
City’s Bank [private bank with participation of Buenos Aires city government]
stated in “El Cronista” [economic newspaper] that "Cristina Fernandez
denies the devaluation in her speeches but in fact she's announcing it with the
'wheat dollar'".
According
to Sebastian Premici, published in Pagina 12 [government-friendly journal],
"this measure was performed by the Commerce Secretary, Guillermo Moreno,
and the exporter cooperatives, organized in Capeco", implying “the refund of
30 dollars by tonne, i.e. 15% of the price". To clarify the issue, Capeco
is the Grains and Oily Export Chamber, created by kirchnerism to face the
entity that regroups the big multinational grain companies, the Oil Industry
Chamber - Grain Export Center (Ciara-Cec). However, Capeco, formerly grouping "little
and medium size" companies, started to represent Aceitera General Deheza
(property of the former kirchnerista senator Roberto Urquia), UPJ (controlled
by Los Grobo) and... Monsanto. In the queue there are the American CHS and the Brazilian
Multigrain. So, instead of being an "anti-monopolist heroic deed",
finished as a mask under which the kirchnerists agrarian capitalist (both
national and foreigners) organize its business and lobby. In fact, Capeco is headed
by Peretti, well know ultra-kirchnerist agrarian capitalist and president of the
Argentinian Council of Producers (CAP). Hence, the difference between
kirchnerism and the macrist opposition [Macri is the right wing major of Buenos
Aires], in this field, would be if the capitalists need a 40% total devaluation
or if a 15% sectorial one is enough.
Also,
we can’t avoid pointing out that one day after the announcement of the
presidential measures, Clarin [right wing opposing journal] issued an article
about the launching of the first transgenic wheat between Argentinean Bioceres
and French Florimond Desprez in the joint-venture Trigall Genetics. As they say:
"we expect to improve the profit between 10 and 15% and it will be available
in 2016" (Clarín, May 8th). Its place of application will be the Mercosur
[economical area of Brasil, Uruguay, Paraguay and Argentina], because "in
Europe the regulations and banners about transgenic products is more
complicated" (Idem). As you can see, with its measures the government encourages
the Argentinean workers to eat transgenic bread.
Lastly,
the presence of the Transport National Secretary in the takeover event of the
new General Secretary of the Train Trade Union (Sasia) shows that kirchnerism
is still the ally of the labor outsourcing bureaucracy that killed Mariano Ferreyra.
The picture of the last political events shows clearly the nature of the decade
of kirchnerism in power as a whole: ten years of soya, devaluation and labor outsourcing.
AFTER TEN YEARS OF INFLATION EATING SALARIES,
WE ARE IN THE FOURTH CONSECUTIVE QUARTER OF FALL FOR THE INDUSTRY, WHILE
255.000 JOBS WERE LOST IN THREE MONTHS
Kirchnerism
goes to elections also after a big effort to negotiate wages under the inflation
rate and trying to pass the "long run collective agreements", i.e.
more than 12 months. With the aid of the trade union bureaucracy, the
government has imposed its aim in lots of key trade unions: UOM [metal
workers], AYSA [water company], SUTERH [doormen], UOCRA [construction workers],
bank employees, meat workers, Luz y Fuerza [electricity workers], UPCN [state
workers]. What government and bureaucracy presented as a general increase of 24%,
is in fact less than 22% because all the agreements were partitioned. But it's
worse: Luz y Fuerza, SUTERH and AYSA accepted the long run collective
agreements (18 months), what is a disastrous precedent under the current rising
inflation. Expected inflation in 2013 according to the index made by the
patronal opposition in Congress is 27%, and this doesn't take into account that
the basic products inflation rise to a greater degree.
On
the other hand, under the ongoing "Rodrigazo" [name of the economic
shock made by Celestino Rodrigo in Argentina in 1975], the Supercard [credit
card issued by the governmet] and the prices controls are not more than an
imposture. In June, the Banco Hipotecario [private bank with public
participation] will issue a 25% annual rate credit card against the 40% of the
privates credit cards and with 0,25% supermarket-tax (against 3% of the
privates). What's the limit of this credit card? 1000 pesos! A farce that
cannot even afford the indigence living standards that is about $1650. The
measure couldn't be more wicked: to use a credit card to eat today is to hypothecate
future. By this, the government is recognizing a hopeless situation, as the
salary is not enough or even the people are unemployed. But, where there is a
need, the government doesn’t see the lack of a right but the opportunity to indebt
workers. It’s the same that it has done with the victims of the recent floods.
The
government also tries to appear as defending the "price controls" while
its scope has been shrunk from 10.000 products to only 500. 9.500 less
products! The same hypocrisy can be seen in the so called "struggle"
against supermarkets when Cristina herself has inaugurated the new Wall Mart
supermarket in Pilar, in a televised event. "To look is to care" [referring
to look over prices], seems to be about looking aside instead of going to fight
for our salary. Another conclusion of the kirchnerist decade can be drawn:
instead of being the government that put the collective agreements back (as it
claims), it's the government that used the collective agreements to restrain
the purchasing power at the same level that in 2001, in the capitalist
bankruptcy.
In
this framework, the measures announced by Cristina about the rising of
"familiar payments", AUH [financial assistance to unemployed mother
regarding the children they have], scholar aid, are not only limited measures without
indexed, universal and permanent nature, but they’re also a deferred subsidy to
the capitalists so that they can continue paying misery salaries. The Tendencia
Piquetera Revolucionaria (TPR) supports every measure that helps to afford our
living, but we reject the kirchnerist imposture: to support misery salaries and
then "defend" the material conditions of workers plundering the ANSES
[pension fund used by the government to pay many of the social aid plans] and
giving money to the capitalists. In order to really improve the living
conditions of workers we defend the same slogan: salary according to the basic
needs. Workers' salary has to be fully paid by the employers, not by the State.
If the employer cannot pay the salaries, so we have to expropriate the company
and put it under workers' control.
The
same can be said about labor indexes: they talk about "job generation"
while the 50% of the workforce is precarious, outsourced or non-registered, the
30% of the urban population is under poverty, half of the workers earn less
that $3500 (pesos), in the last three months 255.000 jobs were lost and the
industry is falling since a year ago. We don't accept the kirchnerist blackmail
and we struggle for a revolutionary alternative against the failure of the
nationalist attempt.
THE THIRD RUN FOR CRISTINA SINKS
BECAUSE OF KIRCHNERISM REVERSE UNDER THE ECONOMIC CRISIS AND THE POPULAR EBULLITION
This
whole scheme is sinking because of the current political and economic crisis.
While Evo Morales, Rafael Correa and Juan Manuel Santos go for a third run for
the elections (the last one with the soulful support of FARC), as a Bonapartist
way to arbitrate against mass struggle and within political crisis, Cristina is
incapable to run for a third run because the political experience she represents
is already exhausted and recoiling. Polls show that more than 80% of the
population is against a third run for Cristina; the positive image of the
government has tumbled (10 points lost because of the corruption affair with
Lázaro Baez); the 54% of votes collected in 2011 elections has evaporated in
front of Cristina's eyes, due to her policy (unable to give a solution to the
crisis), and also to the rising popular demonstrations against the government.
The
kirchnerist celebration on May 25th, actually, was surrounded of
demonstrations showing the popular discontent with the government and the
popular boiling climate that shakes the country. On May 22nd, the
Memory, Truth and Justice Front [TN: EMVJ, left parties and popular
organizations front to fight for democratic rights] demonstrated against
governmental repression and espionage. On May 23rd, a massive demonstration
filled the streets in Resistencia, Chaco, against the brutal repression of
Capitanich and Bacileff Ivanoff [TN: governor and vice-governor] against native
peoples, teachers and piqueteros. On May 24th, lots of classist internal
committees and the left went to Labour Ministry to demonstrate against wage-tax
[TN: tax over salaries] and for the universalization of the family aids. On May
25th in several cities as Buenos Aires and Córdoba, demonstrations saying
"Go out Monsanto!" were developed, as part of the international anti-Monsanto
day. On May 29th, there will be a CTA-Micheli [TN: opposition
Argentinean Workers Central] national strike and pickets. There are several
demonstrations against lay-offs as in Line Bus Nº 60, Lear, Latingráfica and
Firestone. Fel-Fort workers developed strikes and assemblies during 5 days
claiming for permanent jobs to precarious workers and others demands. In SUTEBA
[TN: Teachers from Buenos Aires] elections, the teachers voted massively the
Multicolor list against Baradel's kirchenerist bureaucracy, wining the
leadership of the most important and big branch of the union: La Matanza.
IN ORDER TO MAKE THE MASSES BREAK
WITH THE GOVERNMENT BY THE LEFT, A NEW CLASSIST LEADERSHIP IS NEEDED
The
backlash of the government and the popular ebullition scheme pose the need of a
political leadership to achieve a left way out of the crisis. The masses
rupture with the government, to be developed in a strategic direction, has to express
in the formation of a political alternative. On the contrary, if this doesn't
happen, popular struggle will be contained and kirchenrist exhaustion
capitalized by the political currents which seek for a pro-imperialist way out
of the crisis (right and FAP), or eventually recycled inside kirchnerismo through
its 'endogenous right' (either Boudou or Scioli-Massa).
This
is clearly verified in the policy of the opposing trade union bureaucracy:
after the 20N [TN: first national strike against Cristina Kirchner], Moyano
[leader of the anti-kirchnerist CGT] started to organize a front with the
peronist right (De La Sota, De Narváez, and Lavagna). The isolated struggle
days called by opposition CTA has the aim to increase the influence of Micheli,
to improve Unidad Popular [Micheli's party] bargain power in the FAP's lists.
The conclusion is that if the left doesn’t have a powerful intervention as a political
alternative in the power struggle, is fertilizing the pre-revolutionary
situation to be solved in a right-wing sense.
WE HAVE TO END WITH THE
SUBORDINATION OF THE CENTRIST LEFT TO CRISTINA, THE RIGHT AND THE FAP
A
big sector of the left, however, showed a big subjection to the pro-imperialist
parties. Libres del Sur leads the campaign for a new Alianza [TN: "Alliance",
pro-imperialist center left coalition of the overthrew Argentinean president De
La Rúa] with FAP and UCR. Even, Libres del Sur has justified a front
with...Macri! The MST [TN: morenoist, sympathizer of the Unified Secretariat of
the Fourth International] and PCR [TN: mao-stalinist] are struggling to set a
common platform with FAP in the different provinces they run for elections.
Marea Popular is prone to a front with the left paw of Argentinean caprilism,
i.e. Claudio Lozano, without stating any anti-imperialist program, and without
saying anything on the fact that Lozano supports two-lane devaluation and
external debt payment. The main problem isn’t that they are developing a
"reformist" orientation. To say this would be to embellish them,
because they are not candidatures that express popular claims in a capitalist
way, but they openly militate to build fronts with pro-imperialists features.
It's not about a generic adaptation to the capitalist regime, but directly to their
pro-imperialist representatives, with a center-left key or even right-wing. Therefore,
the challenge and the call to break issued to these organizations have the aim
to call their popular base to repudiate this policy and develop an anti-imperialist
regrouping of the whole left.
The
political destruction of the centrist left under these front-populists
agreements doesn’t directly pave the way to the revolutionary left but weakens
it into marginality and opens the way to the right. The historical experience of
the working class is eloquent in this sense. Against any kind of self-reference
sectarianism, the Tendencia Piquetera Revolucionaria states that the political destruction
of centrism by the right and center-left doesn't show the strength of the
revolutionary left but its isolation and inability to gain and defend possible
allies.
Centrism
is based in its oscillation between reform and revolution. That is why the only
positive way to finish with centrism is that workers join the revolutionaries
because they think we are an alternative. For sure, that political evolution
towards the left needs the intervention of an independent workers party and an
accurate frontist tactic to make workers break with centrist paralysis and draw
the conclusions of the development of their own struggle. Thus, the only way to
achieve this is through the systematic public denounce against the denaturation
of the workers organizations when they are led by pro-imperialist currents and addressing
to their militants a concrete political way out: against the unity with
caprilism, the Tendencia Piquetera Revolucionaria proposes the consequential
anti-imperialist unity.
TO DISPUTE THE ELECTORAL CAMPAING IS
TO DISPUTE WHICH PARTY AND WHICH CLASS HAVE THE POWER
Thus,
the strategic importance of the electoral campaign. The electoral campaign is a
central episode of the class struggle, because in the elections a fight between
parties and programs takes place facing the national crisis. The electoral
political struggle is the most concentrated form of the class struggle, as strategic
proposal of the different classes and their consistence are tested facing the framework
of the capitalist bankruptcy.
Thus,
if the workers, the left, the fighters want to struggle for power against capitalist
parties, we have to take part in the electoral campaign. Through the party programmatic
struggle revolutionaries have the ability to separate the masses from the
capitalist parties and organize them in an independent shape. The only way to
give an independent political representation, by the left, to the popular
demonstrations that are currently shaking Argentina, is developing a party political
struggle in the electoral campaign, promoting the independent organization of
the exploited, and their combat against Cristina, the right and the FAP, and
for a workers government.
Opposing
the electoral campaign to the "class struggle" (as PTS [TN: morenoist
party, organizer of the FTCI], “foquistas” groups, anarchists, autonomous or
blank-voters in general do) means not having understood anything about both of
them. The working class is realized as such through its own political party,
and this is true both in its historical sense for its revolutionary mission,
and in its daily and tangible struggle for the material development of the working
class and the enlargement of its political, moral, recreative, cultural, affective,
sexual and spiritual freedoms. The working class is such in the fullest sense
of the term when it’s organized in a political party and struggles for power in
every area addressing its rebellious agitation to all the exploited classes.
The proletarian political party is the emancipator tool to impel the collective
fight for the liberation of the working class and all the exploited.
THE PARALYSIS OF THE LEFT FRONT
ISOLATES FIGHTERS AND PAVES THE WAY TO KIRCHNERISM AND FAP
This
is not what the FIT is doing. As the foundational statement of the Coordinating
Committee in defense of the Left Front poses, the FIT is prostrated facing the
political crisis. The trend to FIT’s dissolution is so serious that PTS, instead
of developing a big political campaign, has voted in its last Congress the initiative
to solve the difference about FIT’s candidatures in the proscriptive primaries
PASO [TN: governmental mechanism to curb the parties with less than 1.5% run
for the elections]. Partido Obrero [TN: PO, Argentinean section of CRFI],
finally, accepted this proposal and Izquierda Socialista [TN: Argentinean
section of UIT] posed against that, but doesn't develop a public political
struggle for an Open Congress to all the fighters in order to solve this
situation. This is very serious: this left that denies an independent political
intervention, is the left present, more or less, in the demonstrations that are
shaking the country. Is the left that has the electoral legal habilitation in a
national scope and has the practical and organizational capacity to build a
left opposition. Therefore, is their responsibility to lead and convoke all the
fighters.
However,
their denial to intervene as a political factor curbs the independent political
development of those thousands of fighters that go to the streets again and
again. On the contrary, it paves the way for kirchnerism, the right and the FAP.
It's not by accident: they are the same that deny the pre-revolutionary
situation across Latin America and Argentina. They are the same that claim
themselves as the Argentinian representation of the anti-capitalist centrism
and they are the same that refuse, thus, the struggle for a second Argentinazo
[TN: 2001 popular uprising and revolutionary situation in Argentina]. They
don't use their parlametary seats as an integral part of the popular rebellion
(what corresponds to a revolutionary deputy), but they consider themselves as
"claims defenders", what in several moments makes them stand in the
same path with the capitalist parties.
As
examples of this we can mention the presence of Izquierda Socialista in the
#18A [TN: right-wing leaded demonstration against the government. It took place
on April 18th]; their participation with kirchnerism in the March 24th
demonstration and the vote of Liliana Olivero [TN: FIT and Izquierda Socialista
deputy in Córdoba] about the Argentina-Iran memorandum. Also, we can mention PO’s
refusal to fight for "Overthrow Macri! Overthrow Bruera!" [TN: Bruera,
major of La Plata, capital of Buenos Aires province] facing the political
crisis opened by the floods in Buenos Aires. To this enumeration of political mistakes
we have to sum up a long list of political events where the FIT didn't issue
even a press release, showing its lack of policy. As what doesn't go forward
goes backwards, and in policy vacuum don't exist, the FIT's crisis drives the
working class vanguard to isolation and easies the development of kirchnerism
and others front-populist alternatives.
FACING THE COLLAPSE OF THE
KIRCHNERIST GOVERNMENT, LETS OPEN THE LEFT FRONT TO ALL THE FIGHTERS WHO WANT A
LEFT WAY OUT OF THE CRISIS
The
Coordination Committee in defense of the Left Front, on the contrary, has been
organized to fight against this paralysis and dissolution and to pose an
alternative, showing how the Left Front should intervene. The Open Congress to
all the fighters proposed by the Coordinating Committee is an attempt to solve
the current disintegration of the FIT, pointing the need of a left alternative leaded
by the FIT and thus gathering all those who support Left Front. The time is
running: the deadline to submit political alliances and supports in PASO is on
June 12th on June 17th is the deadline to constitute
provisional committees of the electoral lists and on June 22nd to
submit the candidatures lists to PASO.
Thus,
we have until June 12th to achieve the call to an Open Congress.
There are several activists and militants, as the pages of this newspaper show,
that have explicitly supported this proposal. We call the Left Front to answer,
finish its dissolution and call the Congress to vote a program, the campaigns
and the candidatures. Also several parties that are not in the Coordinating
Committee, have publicly asked for their incorporation to the Left Front. The
same goes for the 1.000 signs and dozens of supports to the Coordinating
Committee: we want a public answer. Silence is not the method of
revolutionaries, who always prefer to work transparently. The truth is always revolutionary.
To hide and dodge the discussion only reflects FIT's paralysis and its political
inability to develop an answer.
The
Tendencia Piquetera Revolucionaria commits itself to develop a strong electoral
campaign of the Coordinating Committee in defense of the Left Front, calling
FIT to open itself to all the fighters and lead the left opposition in our country.
This is the only way we can give form to a revolutionary outcome, posing the
workers as a power alternative in the national crisis. Facing the collapse of
the government, the working class and the fighters have to militate the
elections to achieve a left way out. Let’s go for a socialist and workers
alternative. Let's go for a workers government. Let's go with the Coordinating
Committee in defense of the Left Front.
May 27th, 2013
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario